Monday 13 June 2011

Is Your Planning Permission in Good Condition?

Part of an occasional series of planning hints, tips and advice notes by Ian Butter FRICS MRTPI

There you are, still nursing a mild hangover from the post ‘planning committee success’ party and lo and behold the decision notice lands on the mat a few days later. Here are a few things you should do to make sure that what has been granted actually suits your requirements – what you should NOT do is file the decision and phone the builders.

The wealth of pencil lead expended on the subject of planning conditions in the courts and elsewhere would make even Samuel Pepys blanche so I will refrain from a detailed overview, but here are a few key thoughts and suggestions to get you through the next stage in your progress toward that much sought-after scheme.

There are few planning decision notices today that are not issued with an array of accompanying planning conditions. There are some standard ones (like the time limit) that always appear and then a series of others that are often drawn from a standard list, or are bespoke to your particular scheme. These conditions can run on to several pages and will include a justification of why the condition has been applied and there may also be some accompanying ‘Informatives’. I will come back to these later.

Planning Conditions are just that. They define and control the scope of the development that has been permitted and the manner in which it is to be undertaken. On simple applications there may be very few (occasionally none at all), although the ubiquitous landscaping conditions seem to creep into even the most modest of development proposals these days.

In order to properly implement your planning permission - so that it is lawful - you must satisfy the requirements of the conditions. Failure to do so could invalidate your consent and may lead to enforcement issues in the future. I had a call only last week from a householder who had just bought a newly built house but been served with an enforcement notice with respect to conditions that the predecessor owner/builder had failed to comply with. And the builder had emigrated to Australia! Don’t forget,  caveat emptor (the buyer beware) applies: the planning permission runs with the land not the individual.

Job 1: READ THE DECISION THOROUGHLY

This is vital. You need to make sure that there are no nasty surprises. Is the description correct? Does it match the title of your application properly? The planning authority may have re-written it slightly (which is not a problem) but you need to ensure it is for the development you actually applied for in the first place. I know what you’re thinking, but you’d be surprised.

Job 2: SORT THE CONDITIONS

There are generally three types of condition. Those that are simply there to provide information, or set out the terms of the permission, generally require no direct action. However there are others that require certain activities to be undertaken or prior approval secured and these fall into two types; condition that requires works or actions to be undertaken as part of the scheme and Conditions Precedent. Now, it is generally the latter that give people the most trouble – not least because they can be tricky little devils to identify correctly – but essentially any condition that starts with words like, “Before any development commences….” should be regarded as VERY IMPORTANT. The clue is in the word ANY. If you start work on the development before such conditions are properly fulfilled your permission may have just been instantly invalidated. Do not pass Go, do not collect £200.

Job 3: MAKE A SINGLE CONDITIONS APPLICATION (IF YOU CAN)

As is the way in town planning nowadays there is a charge for having conditions signed off. However the Regulations are clear that the charge is per submission not per condition, so if you make one submission for all the conditions it is just one fee – simples!

Job 4: IMPLEMENT THE PERMISSION

Once you have all the conditions signed off by the local authority you can implement your permission by commencing the development. And it is well worth doing so too, as permissions are hard enough and expensive enough to obtain in the first place and all that effort and money shouldn’t go to waste because the permission runs out of time before you get cracking.

A note of caution though. I am assuming you have also obtained any other approvals necessary, such as Building Regulation approval; Section 278 Approval under the Highways Act for works in the public highway; discharge licences; public health and other operating licences etc etc.

MODIFICATIONS

No sooner have you secured your consent but you come up with a cunning plan to modify part of the scheme. What can you do? Some changes are considered so minor that they can be approved by the local authority as a minor modification without needing to adjust the consent and an exchange of letters will suffice. Others may require a minor modifications application or a wholesale planning application for a variation of the relevant condition. The motto of this story is to try and get it right in the first place. You will remain friends with your Architect as well.

APPEALS

What happens if your decision notice contains a raft of unsavory and unworkable conditions (well one at least) that make the permission all but worthless – I exaggerate perhaps, but here again, you’d be surprised.

Think very carefully before you go rushing off to Appeal. If you appeal the decision on the grounds of an unacceptable condition you may be OK, but equally the Inspectorate could reconsider the whole permission. It wouldn’t be the first time an appellant has walked away with a dismissal for the whole scheme, which is then very hard to overcome.

Perhaps the condition is fundamental to the consent and without it the local authority would not have approved permission, but you feel it can be changed or removed. My advice is to submit an application for a variation of the offending condition and then appeal THAT decision if it is subsequently refused. In that way you at least protect the original decision.

ENFORCEMENT

If for some unfathomable reason you decide not to comply with a planning condition you could be served with a breach of condition notice to put the matter right. Just to make your day, there is no right of appeal against such a notice. Go directly to Jail, do not pass Go etc…

If you have carried out building works without consent you might be OK if they have been completed for more than 4 years and you can prove it. A breach of condition though must survive a long and testing 10 years before any sort of defense against the dark arts of enforcement can be brought to bear. My advice? Don’t tempt fate.

INFORMATIVES

Cunningly hanging around at the very end of the conditions (like the neigbours’ barky dog) there may be another round of what appear to be conditions, but under a separate Informatives heading (no one said that development was going to be easy). You will also need to consider the requirements set out in this section. Often they relate to other matters that are not the province of the planning department but are fundamental to the development nonetheless. Please don’t overlook them. They have a way of biting back when you least expect them too.

AND FINALLY

With the development market being so uncertain at the moment it is tempting to obtain permission and then sit on it (not literally you understand) until the market improves. Do keep a weather eye on the expiry date. Like fresh produce, planning permissions can go off (so to speak) and you could find yourself right back to square one if the permission is allowed to lapse by effluxion of time.

Most full permissions generally have a deadline date for implementation of three years (it used to be five) or three years from the date of an outline approval to submit for any detailed permission and then two years for development to commence after that.

If you are running out of time you can now apply for an extension of time. This provision was removed for some time by the previous Government who wanted to force developers to get on with things, but reinstated when a lot of us planners had a go at the Secretary of State for failing to recognise there was a national recession out there.
I hope this thumbnail overview of the word on planning conditions is of help. If you require any further detail then there is a planning document library available at www.ruralurbanplanning.co.uk or do please email me on ianbutter@ruralurbanplanning.co.uk

Wednesday 1 June 2011

Neighbourhood Planning - "You've Got To Be In It To Win It"

Neighbourhood planning is a key plank of the Government’s localism agenda. Local groups can draw up plans, subject them to a referendum, and thereby determine the kind of development they want to prioritise in their local area.

The Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) has made a fresh call for local planning authorities to bid for grants of up to £20,000 under the neighbourhood planning scheme, which is intended to act as a test bed for the coalition’s planning reforms. The call for applications follows amendments to the Localism Bill that are intended to open up the neighbourhood planning process to businesses.

The Government would like to see a greater role for business in neighbourhood plans; to the extent that a financial contribution toward the Plan making process itself ‘would be very nice thank you’. Because only local planning authorities are eligible for the grants under the scheme, Government is asking businesses taking part in the next wave of its neighbourhood planning 'vanguard' scheme to contribute towards the cost of the running the pilots.

Call me an old cynic if you will but what business worth its’ salt is going to chip in to a plan that could – on a democratic referendum basis – bring about its downfall through stricter planning arrangements. (sounds of turkeys singing ‘White Christmas’ off stage left).

Clearly we have the potential for (alleged - ahem) World Cup style finessing to achieve meaningful ends. Is this really what planning has come to?

Some would say planning has always been subject to persuasion by pecuniary ‘interests’ but in my view the ‘brown envelopes over the Chief Execs desk’ has only ever been a myth. Or, at worst, a lone occasion, blown up into an international incident.

Decentralisation minister Greg Clark has indicated that eight "business neighbourhood frontrunners" would develop business-led neighbourhood plans for local business areas and town centres. (see, I told you this was the Royston Vasey approach to planning)

The eight frontrunners are:

- Aldershot Town Centre
- Bankside, London
- Central Milton Keynes
- Liverpool Innovation Park
- Team Valley Trading Estate, Gateshead
- Trafford Park, Manchester
- South Bank, London
- West End, London

Liz Peace, chief executive of the lobby group British Property Federation, said the initiative heralded a "new approach to local planning". (You bet).

"The business neighbourhood frontrunners unveiled today are all areas with an enormous potential for economic growth. Designation as a business neighbourhood should help them to put together a planning and development framework for their areas that allows them to realise that potential."

It would appear that such neighbourhood plans can be set up deliberately for "promoting the carrying on of trades, professions or other businesses in such an area".

Not a bad idea but whereas, in other areas, the residents may have to recognise that businesses do actually exist and development may have to happen, the business neighbourhoods must equally recognise that there may be other interests that need to be taken into account. Who is going to balance all these competing objectives?

Clark said: "We need to involve local companies more explicitly in neighbourhood planning decisions for business areas if communities are to get the most out of them.

"Businesses have access to skills, resources and expertise that can give a real boost to getting the right kind of growth underway in many areas. Business neighbourhood frontrunners are about residents and businesses shaping their neighbourhood together."

Well I thought that was what Planning Policy Statement 4 was all about. Economic Development. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for supporting business development – it’s been my stock in trade for 30 plus years - and getting involved in the plan making process is vitally important too. But to create a financial link (supposedly out of goodwill and neighbourliness) is perhaps going a step too far toward cash for permissions. Or is this just another part of the recent suggestion of financial considerations in planning?  

The closing date for the receipt of applications is Friday 8 July. And remember “You’ve got to be in it to win it”.